Ning-Jia.com

Factors Term Description L + G Passion Ignited flow: Love meets mastery, pure electric energy. L + N Mission Soul-driven crusade: Heart + world, unstoppable fire. L + P Joy Heist Guilty pleasure pay: Thrill cash, but shallow waters. G + N Raw Duty Service utility: Skill for good, quiet and unrewarded. G + P Profession Competent hustle: Talent cashed in, reliable grind. N + P Vocation Noble livelihood: World-healing income, duty fulfilled. L + G + N (missing P) Poor Rapturous impact without a dime—blissfully broke. L + G + P (missing N) Purposeless Cozy skills and coin, but echoing void of meaning. L + N + P (missing G) Uselessness Earned passion for change, fumbled by inexperience. G + N + P (missing L) Emptiness Polished payoff for progress, but soul-starved routine. L + G + N + P Ikigai Total alignment: Alive, adept, essential, and enriched.

Don't rush it. In life, many things deserve a second thought. No, we're not going to miss out. No, that other person isn't thinking about us right now. Take our time. Think it through. What was I about to do? What should I actually do? Why am I doing this? What about that? It isn't analysis paralysis if it's just a night's sleep. Sometimes, that's all we need.

Reading comments from other posts about this, I felt the urge to write. I see it in my own country, amongst family members too, that believing open dialogue can resolve disagreements is increasingly challenging. In an article by Rob Henderson, he noted that many people no longer trust the Enlightenment ideal that words can lead to shared understanding. Henderson highlights a perspective that challenges the notion of objective truth, citing Ezra Klein in The New York Times: “Everything you believe was invented by someone. Your ideas, the books you’ve read, even the words you speak, were all made by powerful people with their own interests and blind spots. The values of speech and open inquiry carry the soiled fingerprints of the societies that championed them.” (Klein, as cited in Henderson, 2025) Henderson elaborates on this perspective, noting that many conclude from this view that “nobody can give an objective account of reality. There is no neutral truth. Every political system, the...

me: You should be less publicly visible. me: Why? me: You'll regret it one day. me: Will I? What will I miss out on though? I've been an open book. I enjoy being an open book.  My vulnerable self is open to the public at any given moment. The public has been kind to me so far. me: You'll make someone angry one day. me: For sure. But I'm also counting on making many others happy every day. me: One angry person will do more harm than 100 happy people. me: Hmm... I want to prove to you that people are kinder than you think.  More courageous than you think. And have more agency than you think. me: You'll regret it. me: Not yet...

I often need to remind myself what recession, stagflation, depression, and other economic terms mean, so here’s a 2x2 matrix to clarify them.  The y-axis represents inflation (high to low), and the x-axis represents GDP growth (high to low). Even with negative growth, we face two bad scenarios: stagflation (high inflation, low growth) and recession/depression (low inflation, low growth). Stagflation and economic booms are typically temporary because they’re unstable states. Recessions can persist and deepen into depressions, while economic booms can last if central banks fail to manage overheating (e.g., through interest rate hikes). As a Gen-Yer, I barely experienced the last major recession during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008–2009. While the pandemic caused a significant downturn, I don’t expect a repeat (barring some mad scientist unleashing chaos). The GFC is likely a better case study for understanding recessions. Unless the current trade war and tariffs escalate ...

Today, I opened my Goodreads profile and was shocked to find I had only read two books this year. Yes, this year has been like no other, but still, I pondered why I had read only two books when, in other years, I typically read at least a dozen. LLMs. That's the answer. I haven't read any less; I've just customized my reading habits significantly since subscribing to various LLMs. I no longer dive into Wikipedia for hours, falling down rabbit holes of interconnected topics. I no longer go through book after book on a subject. Instead, I pull up an LLM, write a prompt, and ask question after question. Fascinating. Note: This was proofread by Grok.

I n the annals of management, few stories illustrate the essence of true innovation as vividly as Henry Ford's creation of the assembly line. It was not, as popular myth might suggest, an invention born of a fascination with mechanical efficiency or a desire to revolutionize factory processes for their own sake. Rather, Ford's breakthrough stemmed from a singular, customer-focused vision: to sell millions of automobiles at a price point of $500 each, making personal transportation accessible to the average American worker. This was no abstract engineering pursuit; it was a deliberate strategy to create and satisfy a vast market that did not yet exist. The assembly line emerged as a means to that end—reducing production costs from over $800 per Model T in 1908 to under $300 by 1914, enabling the $500 retail price that unlocked explosive demand. Ford understood a fundamental principle of business: production is not an end in itself but a tool to serve the customer. As I have lon...

Better the Devil you know than the Angel you don't. This brings me back to my gaming days, where we would align ourselves on a 2x2 matrix. You can be Good or Evil, but the other axis is Order and Chaos. The Devil you know is often Orderly Evil. And it's funny that the D&D franchise portrays Devils like lawyers, where they often bind human souls into contracts with plenty of fine print. This plays into the notion that "the Devil's in the details." But one thing is for sure: these evil characters actually are very law-abiding. However, on the other end of the spectrum, you have the Angel you don't know. She's benevolent but emotional, so her decisions are driven by anger, joy, sadness, etc. While we trust that she has the best of intentions, when she gets involved, we don't know which side of her will show—creating lots of chaos in the events when she's there. We all have people in mind for all four quadrants. But if given the scenario, do you pr...

A while ago, I read about avoiding to be “merely clever.” I can’t quite remember where I read it, but it stuck with me for years. Isn’t cleverness admirable? Why would anyone describe someone as “merely clever”? What lies beyond cleverness? I thought deeply and laid out all the synonyms in my limited vocabulary: - cleverness - intelligence - smartness - knowledgeability - wisdom Another term immediately stood out: - being a “smart ass” Which would I prefer to be called—or not to be called? - merely clever? - a smart ass? I’d like to avoid both if possible, but given my current reputation, would people be more likely to say I’m a smart ass or merely clever? Probably a smart ass.. lol I think I can be arrogant and do irritate people with my argumentative style of conversation. But maybe it’s just because I don’t have anyone around me who’s in a position to call me “merely clever.” Wow, what a realisation.. Having just completed another 10-day Vipassana course recently,...

Have you seen this cycle? It’s referenced time and again during hard times, often blaming "weak men" for causing the struggles we face. While there’s truth to that, I believe we’re missing a crucial component: Unity. Unity is the true source of strength for strong men. We need to learn to collaborate, set aside our differences, and work toward a common cause to become truly strong. Throughout history, it’s through working together that we’ve overcome difficulties and hardship. When we’re scattered, not communicating, or even fighting among ourselves, that’s what creates weak men. And that’s when society truly falls apart. Note: This was proofread by Grok AI.